| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
REVIEW |
Chemical Therapeutics Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 1650 Orleans St. – CRB 162B, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to J T Isaacs; Email: isaacjo{at}jhmi.edu)
Prostatic carcinogenesis is associated with changes in the androgen receptor (AR) axis converting it from a paracrine dependence upon stromal signaling to an autocrine-initiated signaling for proliferation and survival of prostatic cancer cells. This malignant conversion is due to gain of function changes in which the AR activates novel genomic (i.e. transcriptional) and non-genomic signaling pathways, which are not present in normal prostate epithelial cells. During further progression, additional molecular changes occur which allow these unique malignancy-dependent AR signaling pathways to be activated even in the low androgen ligand environment present following androgen ablation therapy. These signaling pathways are the result of partnering the AR with a series of other genomic (e.g. transcriptional co-activators) or non-genomic (e.g. steroid receptor co-activator (Src) kinase) signaling molecules. Thus, a combinatorial androgen receptor targeted therapy (termed CART therapy) inhibiting several points in the AR signaling cascade is needed to prevent the approximately 30,000 US males per year dying subsequent to failure of standard androgen ablation therapy. To develop such CART therapy, a series of agents targeted at specific points in the AR cascade should be used in combination with standard androgen ablative therapy to define the fewest number of agents needed to produce the maximal therapeutic anti-prostate cancer effect. As an initial approach for developing such CART therapy, a variety of new agents could be combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs. These include: (1) 5
-reductase inhibitors to inhibit the conversion of testosterone to the more potent androgen, dihydrotestosterone; (2) geldanamycin analogs to downregulate AR protein in prostate cancer cells, (3) ‘bulky’ steroid analogs, which can bind to AR and prevent its partnering with other co-activators/signaling molecules, and (4) small molecule kinase inhibitors to inhibit MEK, which is activated as part of the malignant AR signaling cascade.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. A. Locke, E. S. Guns, A. A. Lubik, H. H. Adomat, S. C. Hendy, C. A. Wood, S. L. Ettinger, M. E. Gleave, and C. C. Nelson Androgen Levels Increase by Intratumoral De novo Steroidogenesis during Progression of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6407 - 6415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Yemelyanov, J. Czwornog, L. Gera, S. Joshi, R. T. Chatterton Jr., and I. Budunova Novel Steroid Receptor Phyto-Modulator Compound A Inhibits Growth and Survival of Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4763 - 4773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Mimeault, P. P. Mehta, R. Hauke, and S. K. Batra Functions of Normal and Malignant Prostatic Stem/Progenitor Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Cancer Progression and Novel Targeting Therapies Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 234 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lu, J. Lee, M. Revelo, X. Wang, S. Lu, and Z. Dong Smad3 Is Overexpressed in Advanced Human Prostate Cancer and Necessary for Progressive Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells in Nude Mice Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5692 - 5702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
