ERC Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 16 (3) 885 -894     DOI: 10.1677/ERC-09-0042
Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ERC-09-0042v1
16/3/885    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A
Right arrow Articles by Ramage, J K
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A
Right arrow Articles by Ramage, J K

Midgut neuroendocrine tumours with liver metastases: results of the UKINETS study

A Ahmed1,2, G Turner5, B King1, L Jones4, D Culliford6, D McCance5, J Ardill5, B T Johnston5, G Poston4, M Rees1, M Buxton-Thomas2, M Caplin3 and J K Ramage1,2

1 Basingstoke and North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
2 Institute of Liver Studies and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
3 Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
4 Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
5 Neuroendocrine Tumour Group, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
6 Research and Development Support Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

(Correspondence should be addressed to J K Ramage, Department of Gastroenterology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9NA, UK; Email: john.ramage{at}bnhft.nhs.uk)

We intended to identify the prognostic factors and the results of interventions on patients with liver metastatic midgut carcinoids. Five institutions that are part of United Kingdom and Ireland neuroendocrine tumour (NET) group took part in this study. Patients were included if they had histology proven NET of midgut origin and liver metastases at the time of the study. Clinical and biochemical data were collected retrospectively from hospital charts, pathology reports, radiology reports and biochemistry records for each patient. Three hundred and sixty patients were included in the study. The median survival from date of diagnosis was 7.69 years (confidence interval (CI) 6.40–8.99) and 5.95 years (CI 5.02–6.88) from date of diagnosis of liver metastases. On univariate analysis, increasing age at diagnosis, increasing urinary hydroxyindole acetic acid levels, increasing plasma chromogranin A levels, high Ki67, high tumour volume and treatment with chemotherapy were identified as factors associated with a significantly poorer outcome. Resection of liver metastases, resection of small bowel primary, treatment with somatostatin analogue therapy and treatment with peptide receptor therapy were associated with improved prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that age at diagnosis (P=0.014), Ki67 level (P=0.039) and resection of primary (P=0.015) were independent predictors of survival. This is the largest study to our knowledge looking specifically at the prognosis and clinical course of patients with liver metastatic midgut NETs. For the first time, we have shown that Ki67 and resection of primary are independent predictors of survival for this group of patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Endocrinology.