ERC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 5 (1) 1-14    DOI: 10.1677/erc.0.0050001
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for Endocrinology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (105)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, R
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, R
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M G

Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone action

R White 1 and M G Parker 1

1 Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK

The ability of oestrogens and androgens to stimulate the growth of a number of endocrine cancers is well established and several endocrine therapies are widely used to reduce the availability of the hormones or to block their action. These include non-steroidal hormone antagonists such as tamoxifen and flutamide, steroidal compounds which include ICI 182780 and cyproterone acetate, and both steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. Although we have learned a great deal about the molecular mechanism of steroid hormone action, it is still unclear as to how hormones stimulate the proliferation of tumour cells and how hormone antagonists function. In part this is a result of the ability of oestradiol and testosterone to regulate the expression of many proteins implicated in the control of cell proliferation making it difficult to identify the crucial targets. Some of these targets are growth factors and/or their receptors which suggests that the mitogenic effects of steroids may be mediated by indirect autocrine or paracrine mechanisms (Clarke et al. 1991, Roberts and Sporn 1992). Alternatively since steroids regulate the expression of certain cyclins or kinase inhibitors (Musgrove and Sutherland 1994, Altucci et al. 1996) they may control cell cycle progression directly. Recent work suggests that as well as the cyclin D1 gene, cyclin D1 itself may be a crucial target (Zwijsen et al. 1997) but additional proteins could also be important in different subsets of tumours.

The identification of target genes for steroid hormones is further complicated by the observation that receptor signalling is cross-coupled with that of other signalling pathways. It used to be thought that signalling by receptors was relatively straightforward compared with most other signalling pathways, since the receptor itself is a transcription factor. It is now clear however, that growth factors, neurotransmitters and other hormones are able to modulate the activity of steroid hormone receptors (Power et al. 1991, Aronica and Katzenellenbogen 1993, Ignar-Trowbridge et al. 1993 ). This means that alterations in the activity of receptors and the expression of individual target genes involved in cell proliferation is determined not only by hormonal signals but also by changes in other signalling pathways, which undoubtedly take place during breast and prostate cancer progression. Receptors are also capable of regulating the activity of a number of other transcription factors, either directly or indirectly, and thereby modulate the ability of other signalling pathways to control gene transcription (Shemshedini et al. 1991, Philips et al. 1993, Stein and Yang 1995, Webb et al. 1995).

Although the precise role of steroid hormones in cell proliferation is still ill-defined, tremendous progress has been made in elucidating the role of hormones in receptor activation and the mechanism by which hormone antagonists block this activity. In particular two recent advances have been made which provide new insights into steroid hormone action and the function of nuclear receptors in general. Firstly, models for the three-dimensional structure of the ligand binding domain of several receptors have been determined (Bourguet et al. 1995, Renaud et al. 1995, Wagner et al. 1995) and secondly, novel proteins have been identified (Halachmi et al. 1994, Cavaillés et al. 1994) which interact with receptors in a ligand dependent manner and may play a role in gene transcription. These developments are helping to provide a better understanding of the mechanism of action of both hormones agonists and antagonists and the links between nuclear receptors and other signalling pathways. In this review we will outline these advances, with reference to the oestrogen receptor, and discuss their relevance to antioestrogen therapy and tamoxifen resistance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
H. V. Heemers and D. J. Tindall
Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: A Diversity of Functions Converging on and Regulating the AR Transcriptional Complex
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 778 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
D. Nonclercq, F. Journe, I. Laios, C. Chaboteaux, R.-A. Toillon, G. Leclercq, and G. Laurent
Effect of nuclear export inhibition on estrogen receptor regulation in breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 39(2): 105 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Howell
Pure oestrogen antagonists for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 689 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Solakidi, A-M.G. Psarra, S. Nikolaropoulos, and C.E. Sekeris
Estrogen receptors {alpha} and {beta} (ER{alpha} and ER{beta}) and androgen receptor (AR) in human sperm: localization of ER{beta} and AR in mitochondria of the midpiece
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3481 - 3487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Rzewuska-Lech, M. Jayachandran, L. A. Fitzpatrick, and V. M. Miller
Differential effects of 17{beta}-estradiol and raloxifene on VSMC phenotype and expression of osteoblast-associated proteins
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2005; 289(1): E105 - E112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. J. Clarke, V. A. Tobin, S. Pompolo, and A. Pereira
Effects of Changing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Frequency and Estrogen Treatment on Levels of Estradiol Receptor-{alpha} and Induction of Fos and Phosphorylated Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Binding Protein in Pituitary Gonadotropes: Studies in Hypothalamo-Pituitary Disconnected Ewes
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1128 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
E. R. Levin
Bidirectional Signaling between the Estrogen Receptor and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2003; 17(3): 309 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Henderson, A. J. Russell, S. Hird, M. Munoz, J. L. Clancy, G. M. Lehrbach, S. T. Calanni, D. A. Jans, R. L. Sutherland, and C. K. W. Watts
EDD, the Human Hyperplastic Discs Protein, Has a Role in Progesterone Receptor Coactivation and Potential Involvement in DNA Damage Response
J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26468 - 26478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J D Teale, G Wark, and V Marks
The biochemical investigation of cases of hypoglycaemia: an assessment of the clinical effectiveness of analytical services
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2002; 55(7): 503 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Jayachandran and V. M. Miller
Ovariectomy upregulates expression of estrogen receptors, NOS, and HSPs in porcine platelets
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): H220 - H226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. A. Hughes
Minireview: Sex Differentiation
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3281 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
R. B. Dickson and G. M. Stancel
Chapter 8: Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Processes in Normal and Cancer Cells
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, July 1, 2000; 2000(27): 135 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. Contreras and F. Talamantes
Growth Hormone (GH) and 17{beta}-Estradiol Regulation of the Expression of Mouse GH Receptor and GH-Binding Protein in Cultured Mouse Hepatocytes
Endocrinology, October 1, 1999; 140(10): 4725 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. M. Hyder, C. Chiappetta, and G. M. Stancel
Synthetic Estrogen 17alpha -Ethinyl Estradiol Induces Pattern of Uterine Gene Expression Similar to Endogenous Estrogen 17beta -Estradiol
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 1999; 290(2): 740 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. F. Couse and K. S. Korach
Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 358 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for Endocrinology.